UPDATED: COVID-19 news and numbers
Building an equal future for women in Atlantic Canada
SPECIAL REPORT: Facets of family violence
Have you tried the SaltWire News app?
What's working for businesses in 2021?
What COVID-19 has taught us about long-term care
SaltWire Selects: Stories you don't want to miss
Continuing coverage: Mass shooting in Nova Scotia
I am writing in response to Gwynne Dyer’s piece on cultured meat and the ruminates contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions (Salvation in a stainless-steel vat, Dec. 19).
As I often do while reading The Guardian, I was left holding my head in my hands and muttering “good grief people are stunned.”
First, I am not sure why the world tolerates any destruction of the Amazon, but I am not shocked that we do.
Humanity has many blind spots; our cities are most often built on class 1 agricultural land, we consume most of our resources in a linear manufacturing process that ends up as waste and pollution and every year we have more gadgets plugged into the grid than the year before.
Modern life is all about emissions, yet the narrative is often about the poor cow and how much better it would be if we had less of them. I am not persuaded at all.
I don’t know much about cultured meat, but I do know that it will not be emission free and I am doubtful it would be as nutritious.
The ruminate is a recycling, engineering miracle in my opinion, converting indigestible lignin into soil nutrients and healthy food.
I feel people are forgetting the purpose and the value of the ruminate in the ecosystem.
In 1492 it is estimated that there were 60 million buffalo in North American. Today there might be about 10 million dairy cows on the continent as a rough reference.
The cows are not the biggest problem and their demise would result in a disproportionate ecological loss.
Gwynne’s final paragraph about what to do with the farm families was a most comedic end and totally insincere.