<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=288482159799297&amp;ev=PageView&amp;noscript=1">

Web Notifications

SaltWire.com would like to send you notifications for breaking news alerts.

Activate notifications?

Saltwire Logo

Welcome to SaltWire

Register today and start
enjoying 30 days of unlimited content.

Get started! Register now

Already a member? Sign in

GUEST OPINION: P.E.I. water issue is not urban versus rural

Gary Schneider of the Coalition for the Protection of P.E.I. Water appears before a standing committee on Thursday. Schneider said lifting the moratorium on high capacity wells could have unintended consequences.
Gary Schneider of the Environmental Coalition of P.E.I. appears before a standing committee earlier this year. - Stu Neatby

STORY CONTINUES BELOW THESE SALTWIRE VIDEOS

Organizing Through Music | SaltWire #professionalorganizers #productivity #organization

Watch on YouTube: "Organizing Through Music | SaltWire #professionalorganizers #productivity #organization"

It is disturbing to hear the genuine public concern over high-capacity wells being deliberately misinterpreted as “urban versus rural” and as an attack against farmers. The Environmental Coalition of Prince Edward Island has been working for years to usher in a new era of water protection and conservation, and never once have we opposed farmers. Farmers are important to the economic and social health of the province.

What we have consistently opposed is the form of industrial agriculture that continues to result in fish kills and anoxic events, reduced water levels in streams and depleted levels of organic matter in soils.

Many excellent farmers in the province realize that a healthy environment is critical to their future existence. To paint this issue as farmers versus non-farmers does them a disservice.

Members of the National Farmers Union (NFU) have long advocated for better management practices. Doug Campbell, P.E.I.’s NFU district director, was recently quoted as saying: “Why do we have no organic matter in our soil? The reason for that is because of the way the land is being farmed. Why is that? Because of pressure from industrialized farming.”

We’ve also had conversations with other farmers who are very concerned about the direction of potato farming and the influence of the Irving family, which is where the push for high-capacity wells is coming from. Clearly, not all farmers want or could afford high-capacity wells.  But their voices are seldom heard.

In 2013, the P.E.I. Potato Board and Cavendish Farms asked the P.E.I. government to lift a long-standing moratorium on high-capacity wells in the province. Indirectly, this led to the development of a new Water Act. During the public process to develop the act, there were 57 presentations, along with written submissions from a diverse range of groups and individuals, and from industry. The vast majority of these presentations wanted the moratorium on high-capacity wells to be kept in place. This was also the recommendation in the environmental advisory committee report on the meetings.

Unfortunately, the Water Act passed in 2017 has yet to be proclaimed, and the revised regulations still have not been released for public comment. During this time, there have been a number of new holding ponds developed that would not be permitted under the draft regulations. We need to enact the Water Act, to maintain the high-capacity wells moratorium, and prohibit holding ponds.  

But we also need to find a way out of the unsustainable cycle we’re in. Climate change will likely bring hotter and drier summers. The need for irrigating potatoes will be greatest when water is less and less available, and when the need for water to maintain ecosystem health is the greatest. At the same time that more water is needed for agriculture, we should be taking less.

More high-capacity wells will only enable this increasingly unsustainable cycle. We need to find ways of doing agriculture differently.

Considering water as a common good and a public trust requires all of us to conserve and protect it. Water should not be seen as a resource, simply to be extracted and exploited, but as an essential part of living ecosystems that support all life. It is imperative that respect for protecting fresh water be at the forefront of decision-making when it comes to water extraction. P.E.I. is one of only a small number of places entirely dependent upon groundwater. This makes P.E.I. unique and also vulnerable to any disturbance in the ecosystem.

And clearly, all water use is not equal. Humans need clean drinking water and that should be our first priority. Ecosystem health should always be a priority since it must be preserved in part to provide the life-giving essence mentioned above. Domestic use and emergency use for firefighting are next. Agriculture and industry are generally far down the priority list for access to water.

Islanders are once again at a crossroads. We can be ever more committed to an industrial model of agriculture, with more water usage, larger fields, less and less soil organic matter, shrinking windbreaks, continuing fish kills and anoxic conditions, fewer farmers on larger acreages, and a small number of jobs created per acre.

Or we can look at truly becoming the Garden of the Gulf, with excellent drinking water, food security and tremendous employment opportunities (as our organic growers and innovative small and large farmers have demonstrated throughout the pandemic). All Islanders would live in a healthy environment that continued to improve, and we would become a haven for tourists looking for a beautiful, safe and sustainable place to visit.

Wouldn’t it be wonderful to be able to say we are Canada’s Food Island without having dead fish in the water? And, especially in an era of escalating climate change, it is good for all of us to remember that no one, and nothing, lives without clean water.

Gary Schneider, Ann Wheatley and Don Mazer represent the Environmental Coalition of P.E.I.

Op-ed Disclaimer

SaltWire Network welcomes letters on matters of public interest for publication. All letters must be accompanied by the author’s name, address and telephone number so that they can be verified. Letters may be subject to editing. The views expressed in letters to the editor in this publication and on SaltWire.com are those of the authors, and do not reflect the opinions or views of SaltWire Network or its Publisher. SaltWire Network will not publish letters that are defamatory, or that denigrate individuals or groups based on race, creed, colour or sexual orientation. Anonymous, pen-named, third-party or open letters will not be published.

It has been our privilege to have the trust and support of our East Coast communities for the last 200 years. Our SaltWire team is always watching out for the place we call home. Our 100 journalists strive to inform and improve our East Coast communities by delivering impartial, high-impact, local journalism that provokes thought and action. Please consider joining us in this mission by becoming a member of the SaltWire Network and helping to make our communities better.
Share story:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Local, trusted news matters now more than ever.
And so does your support.

Ensure local journalism stays in your community by purchasing a membership today.

The news and opinions you’ll love starting as low as $1.

Start your Membership Now

Unlimited access for 50¢/week for your first year.