• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (3)
  •  

Potato board in agreement with Sustainable Land Management study

Published on March 15, 2013
Published on March 15, 2013
Eric McCarthy  RSS Feed
Topics :
P.E.I. Potato Board , Actin Committee for Sustainable Land Management , Barclay Brook , Prince Edward Island

O’LEARY -- Environmentally sustainable production of potatoes is not only in the best interest of the natural environment and all Islanders, but it is also the most economically sustainable option for growers, the P.E.I. Potato Board acknowledged in a recent press release.

The board was responding to the recently released report of the Actin Committee for Sustainable Land Management. The committee was struck to study last year’s fish deaths in the Barclay Brook, near O’Leary. The board was represented on the committee by its general manager, Greg Donald, and by board chair Gary Linkletter. Individual farmers along the Barclay Brook watershed also contributed to the study during the investigation and consultation process.

The committee subsequently determined last summer’s fish deaths were caused by run-off from agricultural fields during heavy rainfall.

Of the 18 recommendations the committee put forward to mitigate against future fish mortality, the Potato Board focuses on three – the need to implement soil conservation practices in fields adjacent to watercourses; the establishment of an environmental fund for the removal from agricultural production land that is prone to soil erosion and surface runoff, and the need to have agricultural engineers examine fields in the area of  fish mortality as soon as possible after an event.

“Prince Edward Island potato farmers are supportive of efforts such as these that carefully examine events that impact the Island’s rivers and streams and provide specific recommendations that can be collaboratively acted upon,” outlined the board.

Island growers, the board advised, currently work with a number of watershed groups, soil conservation groups, and government officials to find better ways to grow potatoes while being effective stewards of the land and eliminating adverse effects on shared natural resources.

Comments

  • Username
    UPWESTER
    - March 18, 2013 at 13:59:24

    What took you so long? It's still nice to hear that you as a group want to have sustainable farming.The number of major fish kills in the last ten years is nothing short of alarming. Now that the committee has determined that the fish kill was a direct result of runoff from those fields, maybe now they can charge the culprit.

    Submit a comment

  • Bill Kays
    Bill Kays
    - March 17, 2013 at 13:19:25

    I forgot to tell you, follow the money and see who is funding not just this study but all of these "SUSTAINABILITY" studies worldwide. There is plenty of monies made available for these types of studies because it advances the globalist's agenda for a one world government. The best source of info on this subject would be Rosa Koire and her film "BEHIND THE GREEN MASK". watch it on youtube. It will open your eyes and answer all your questions about the United Nations and "Agenda 21".

    Submit a comment

  • Bill Kays
    Bill Kays
    - March 17, 2013 at 13:12:51

    If I was not a good steward of the land before today, chances are I will not be a good steward of the land tomorrow, just because I am supposed to follow these rules.I quote from the story, "Island growers, the board advised, currently work with a number of watershed groups, soil conservation groups, and government officials to find better ways to grow potatoes while being effective stewards of the land and eliminating adverse effects on shared natural resources". This is not what we want here. This is another part truth that only tells part of the story. You see they do not tell you the whole story, partly because the same people promoting it are also kept in the dark about the real intention. The other part of the whole truth is the enforcement and penalty aspects of this. They will get you first to agree that "sustainability" is wonderful and we should all do it. Then it will be "let's do it at any cost. They have all their powerpoint presentations and bullet points but I ask this question. All of these watershed groups, conservation groups, etc. come under the direction of WHO? You might think that they are all totally unrelated and have nothing to do with one another. This is all AGENDA 21 crap disguised and camouflaged so as not to alarm us, while they quietly take over our land, our waterways, our seas, our natural resources, etc. Harper and other Prime Ministers before him have all signed UNITED NATIONS TREATIES which effectively gives the UN control over all our natural resources. We were sold outr a long timre ago but is just coming to the light recently. The bad part of all this is that they trick us into basically doing their work for them under the auspices of HELPING MOTHER NATURE or STOP BREATHING OUT CARBON DIOXIDE because they say it is bad . It is a ruse to control our land and water use first through recommendations then ultimately through legislation. They are smart and they know what they are doing. Lord, help us.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising