• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (8)
  •  

City woman convicted of third impaired driving charge

Prince County Courthouse.

Prince County Courthouse.

Nancy MacPhee
Published on March 11, 2013
Published on March 11, 2013
Nancy MacPhee  RSS Feed

SUMMERSIDE — A 36-year-old city woman was convicted Monday of her third impaired driving charge.

Topics :
Water Street , Summerside , MacKenzie Drive

Amanda Dawn Moase was on trial after pleading not guilty an incident on Dec. 22 in the city. The charge was laid just three weeks after she had been caught behind the wheel drunk.

Const. Jason Blacquiere testified an eyewitness came into Summerside police station around 11:30 p.m. on Dec. 22 to report a car had gone off the road at the intersection of MacKenzie Drive and Water Street.

The witness said they saw a man, a shorter woman, who they thought was driving, and white dog exit the car, which had gone through the stop sign at the intersection, drove across Water Street and landed about 100 feet off the road in a field near Community Connections.

Blacquiere and another officer located the man and the woman — Moase — minutes later walking on South Drive.

The long-time police constable with extensive experience with impaired driving cases and as a breath technician testified Moase was visibly drunk, with bloodshot eyes, smelling of alcohol and unsteady on her feet, testimony that was backed up by a second police constable who was on the scene.

Police let Moase go, since, as Blacquiere testified, there wasn’t enough evidence to lay an impaired driving charge although she was visibly impaired.

Const. Dale Corish testified that the day after the accident he took a statement from Moase who had gone into the police station. At that time, she admitted driving the car but said she had only had two beers earlier in the evening.

Moase, who took the stand in her own defence, testified she had driven through the intersection because she had been distracted by a conversation she was having with her passenger. She admitted to smoking a marijuana joint after the crash, which, she said, was why she appeared drunk when stopped by police.

Moase said she didn’t admit to driving to police at that time of the accident since she didn’t have a license.

Judge Jeff Lantz, after taking a lengthy break to review the evidence, said he didn’t believe Moase’s testimony and convicted her of impaired driving.

Moase was to be sentenced Monday on another impaired driving charge stemming from an incident on Nov. 25.

Around 2:30 a.m. city police observed a vehicle leave the Taproom with no lights on and on the wrong side of the road. The car, driven by Moase, was stopped and the woman stumbled out of the driver’s side.

She was told to get back into the car and was questioned by police. Moase had red, glossy eyes, slurred speech and couldn’t find her licence.

She was asked to exit the car and again stumbled and told police, “Yeah, I am the least drunk of the bunch,” referring to her three passengers.

Moase was convicted of impaired driving in March 2011.

Her lawyer, Trish Cheverie, requested that a presentence report be prepared.

Sentencing on both charges will take place at 10 a.m. on April 30.

 

nmacphee@journalpioneer.com

 

 

Comments

  • Username
    Earl Wallace
    - March 18, 2013 at 20:49:53

    What ever you get wont be enough.Time to grow up and think of other people besides yourself.Who ever the hell West is should read the article again and rethink the comment he wrote.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    dave
    - March 13, 2013 at 16:44:03

    the cops are the judge. lanzt just reads out a sentence and goes along with what ever the cops say

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      the accused
      - March 14, 2013 at 14:56:11

      lanzt is the judge...he is to make a judgement based on the facts, and to prove beyond a reasonable doubt a guilty charge. Innocent until proven guilty? justice was NOT served in this case. There was room for plenty of reasonable doubt.

  • Username
    The accused
    - March 13, 2013 at 14:45:04

    *west...thank you for the advice...do you have a number i can reach either at? *what...you clearly i some way know who i am, and although i truly appreciate the smack talk and your own ignorance in the situation (cleary, as you weren't there) i suppose if i admitted to the first 2, would it not stand to reason that if I felt the third was legit, i would have admitted to that one also? I WILL be appealing this decision...

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Cindy Simon
    - March 12, 2013 at 10:12:52

    The laws have been update and continue to be regarding drinking and driving..what i dont understand is why the judges are not held to sentence them to these new laws..cindy simon

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Three times your out
    - March 11, 2013 at 19:33:02

    Her 3rd charge? Time to say enough. Throw her behind bars before she kills someone. No weekends served and other BS give her maximum sentence!!

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    west
    - March 11, 2013 at 18:52:59

    if someone knows this girl tell her to call wendell maxwell in moncton or robert rideout in moncton and apeal it garrenteed off the hook dont let judge lanz cide with there local police to convict inacent people

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      what??
      - March 12, 2013 at 20:03:35

      Convict Innocent people?? (WEST) - this is her 3rd conviction!! She has 4 young and easily influenced children at home to raise - what kind of example is she sending? Its disgusting. She has no licence - she should have the book thrown at her!!!!!!! Its about time our roads are safe from selfish ignorant drunk drivers, whom think nothing of anyone else but themselves!!!

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising