• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (5)
  •  

Hall Findlay stands her ground on supply management

 Dairy farmers confront Hall Findlay  Dairy Farmers of P.E.I. chairman, Harold MacNevin, center, looks on as Foxley River dairy producer Peter Bulger presents an ADL calendar to Federal Liberal leadership candidate Martha Hall Findlay. The farmers met the candidate during her coffee shop stop at O’Leary Corner Monday, hoping to change her views on supply management. “We more or less agreed to disagree,” MacNevin said.

Dairy farmers confront Hall FindlayDairy Farmers of P.E.I. chairman, Harold MacNevin, center, looks on as Foxley River dairy producer Peter Bulger presents an ADL calendar to Federal Liberal leadership candidate Martha Hall Findlay. The farmers met...

Published on March 4, 2013
Published on March 4, 2013
Eric McCarthy  RSS Feed
Topics :
Atlantic Canada , United States , Foxley River

O’LEARY CORNER -- Federal Liberal leadership candidate Martha Hall Findlay stood her ground Monday when dairy farmers challenged her position on supply management. Hall Findlay authored a paper last year arguing supply management has to go.

Three farmers greeted her at O’Leary Corner during the first stop on her cross-P.E.I. coffee shop tour.

While the leadership candidate argued the removal of supply management would reduce the cost of dairy products to consumers, Dairy Farmers of P.E.I. chairman, Harold MacNevin, countered it would only benefit multi-nationals in “a race to the bottom.”

“Multi-nationals go where the cheapest labour, the cheapest environmental regulations, the cheapest inputs are. We can’t compete with that,” he insisted.

In her research paper Hall Findlay called supply management a stumbling block to Canada’s full participation in international free trade agreements, and said it is unfair to Canadian consumers.

MacNevin argued supply management gives dairy farmers a stable income “We’re not entitled to a stable income?” he asked Hall Findlay.

When she pointed out dairy products are much higher in Canada than in the United States, MacNevin argued Americans get a 31 cent subsidy on every liter of milk they produce, meaning American consumers pay at the store and through their taxes.

“I’m not disagreeing the Americans subsidize. Let’s work it out with the Americans,” said Hall Findlay.

“We haven’t been very successful in that area with softwood lumber or hogs or beef or vegetables, working things out with the Americans,” Foxley River farmer Peter Bulger responded. “Maybe when you’re able to prove yourself that you’re able to take on the Americans in those areas, then we could talk about it.”

The price won’t go down to consumers; it will go down to farmers. It’s happened in a number of countries where it’s been deregulated. - Dairy producer, Peter Bulger

“Well, that’s the Canada I would like to see. I would like to see us take on the Americans, because we haven’t done it strongly enough,” she shot back.

“If you’re really concerned about low-income people, the dismantling of supply management is the wrong tree to be barking up, seriously,” Bulger instructed the leadership candidate. “The price won’t go down to consumers; it will go down to farmers. It’s happened in a number of countries where it’s been deregulated.”

Retired dairy farmer Ronnie MacWilliams predicted Atlantic Canada would lose its processing sector and its dairy farms if supply management were removed, insisting Atlantic Canada would not be able to compete with the large farm units of Ontario and Quebec.

In an interview following the debate among the coffee shop tables, Hall Findlay said supply management is so political that many MPs are afraid to discuss it.

“To have so many MPs say to me over the years, ‘We know it has to go, but we don’t have the votes,’ is, to me, the height of hypocrisy,” she said.

“We need to have more people who have the guts to stand up for what they believe,” Hall Findlay said in defending her position.

 

Comments

  • Username
    bmc
    - March 10, 2013 at 11:36:05

    If you read West Prince Graphic along with the Journal you will get an even wider view of just what Martha said about the farmers. "How much fun do you think it is to walk into a Tim Horton's and have 3 VERY WEALTHY FARMERS yell at you?" I did not know those 3 men were very wealthy, in fact I did not know that PEI diary farmers are."MILLIONAIRES" as she indicated later in the news item. I think she needs to get a new job or become better informed re. the real farmers here on PEI

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Bill
    - March 5, 2013 at 19:55:36

    I have Four young children. We use 4 litres of milk a day. In PEI this costs us $3.75 for 2 litres. That's $7.50 a day or $2737.50 per year. If I lived in Maine it would be $4 a gallon (3.5 litres) that works out at $2.28 for 2 litres, $4.56 per day or $1664.40 per year. Why should I pay an extra $1073.10 per year? Supply management stinks. It takes money from families with young children and gives it to wealthy farmers.

    Submit a comment

    • Username
      Mark
      - March 6, 2013 at 14:23:12

      you are right Bill, it is alot of money but remember if you lived in maine you would be paying for your milk twice... once at the store counter and the second time through your taxes. the U.S. subsidises their farmers. In Canada, you pay once and that's it.

  • Username
    Farmman
    - March 5, 2013 at 13:43:43

    She wrote the paper last year, sure, but she is heavily involved in a political race right now. This is just an angle for her to use as a prop; It does not stand up to the knowledge of these guys, who get out there and practice it every day and night. Good job fellas. Meanwhile her opponent in the race, Justin Trudeau, claims a "pro farm" stance. Good, why isn't he making these arguements for the farmers then?

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Wendy Holm
    - March 5, 2013 at 13:26:36

    Good for you Harold. When confronted by facts, Martha's argument is dust in the wind. What would Martha have the Americans do? Does she think she can get Washington to "take away" the US subsidy? Does she "get it" that this would put US farmers out of business? Or does she think US processors will pay the difference and pass it on to the consumer? I suspect the answer is she doesn't think: Martha believes she is right and has stopped listening. My March column in Western Dairy Farmer again challenges her to a debate on this one...

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising