• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (5)
  •  

Case of farmer charged in connection to fish kill adjourned

Published on January 8, 2013
Published on January 8, 2013

SUMMERSIDE — The case of a 58-year-old Mount Royal farmer charged in connection with a fish kill in West Prince in the summer of 2011 has been once again adjourned.

Topics :
Warren Ellis Produce , Mount Royal , Summerside

The case was last before the court in December, at which time Warren Ellis’ lawyer requested an adjournment to allow him to review disclosure he had only received earlier that week.

Ellis wasn’t in Summerside provincial court Tuesday morning to answer to charges that he and his company, Warren Ellis Produce Inc., face under the federal Fisheries Act. The charges, under section 40(2) of the act, allege that sometime between July 21 and 23, 2011, near Mount Royal, that Ellis did: “deposit or permit the deposit of a deleterious substance in waters frequented by fish or in any place under any conditions where the deleterious substance may enter such water, to wit, the Trout River Watershed, in violation of section 36.(3) of the Fisheries Act.”

No pleas have been entered on the charges and no facts have been presented.

Ellis’ lawyer requested a further adjournment, citing a family health matter of the Crown attorney in the case as a reason, noting both parties have yet to sort through disclosure.

Judge Jeff Lantz set the matter over until Feb. 12 at 9 a.m.

 

 

 

Comments

  • Username
    poor tax payer
    - January 12, 2013 at 14:09:47

    why buy a dodge if you had trouble with it and had to wate as long to have it fixed as it is taking to get the so called farmer to court it would be rusted out anyway

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Rose Hicken
    - January 9, 2013 at 14:14:59

    I think our court system should be used to Ellis and his lawyer's constant adjournments. If I were the judge hearing this case I would tell them I had enough of their stalling tactics the last time and insist that there would be no more adjournments. I would also insist that Ellis appear before me, not just his lawyer.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    don
    - January 9, 2013 at 02:05:34

    what about the other farmer that was charged? oh that's right to he was a ministers hubby his ticket was fixed not to be paid. plus i wonder if the inspector was told never to go to that farm again? patronage.and this guy i would fine him $50,000 fine.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Just another hand out
    - January 8, 2013 at 22:08:32

    Everybody should go buy a dodge so he can afford to pay the fine.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    MERRY GO ROUND AGAIN
    - January 8, 2013 at 18:18:29

    It worked for him last time why not stall again until it is forgotten.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising