Customize your website

Councillors question need for housing limits



Published on September 8th, 2010
Published on September 8th, 2010
Mike Carson RSS Feed
Topics :
Dominion Distributing

 

SUMMERSIDE – Despite recommendations from staff, city council’s technical services committee is calling for a bylaw change permitting an increase in the number of row houses allowed for a development.

The committee received a request from developer Mike Fraser for a nine-unit row house development on the former Dominion Distributing properties at 489 Water St. and for zoning changes. The properties encompass two different zones; commercial 3 and residential 3. Both would have to be changed to residential 4 to accommodate the project.

City regulation allows for a maximum of eight row house units as provided in the city’s Official Plan.

Staff did not support the requested change.

Technical services director, Aaron MacDonald, along with city planner Murray Pinchuk, and development officer Thayne Jenkins told the committee if the project came forward with the maximum eight units as allowed under the bylaw, it would require no major variances to be approved.

But if the additional unit was allowed it would affect the size of the other eight requiring variances for each to be approved. The addition of the ninth unit would alter the plan to the extent that nine variances would have to be approved.

The city’s technical services staff felt the request to change the maximum number of units from eight to nine “is not justified from a planning principle or land use hardship. The request for nine units is an economic argument only that allows the developer to fully maximize the development potential of their property.”

Pinchuk said the reasoning behind the maximum requirements for the number of row houses allowed and the required setbacks from lot lines is so that people would not be building on top of the neighbour’s property.

“When we squeeze buildings to the maximum (to) the minimum setbacks on the side yards (and maximum height allowed) imagine then the neighbours on one side or the other are going to be faced with a three-storey building on their side yard when typically the buildings are one-and-a-half and two storeys,” he said. “If I brought you an application for a single-family (home) in a R-1 zone and was going to build right to the zero-lot lines and asked you for a variance you can expect that the neighbours might react to the fact that they’ll have a two-and-a-half or three-storey massive building (next to them).”

He said the principles are in place to balance the need of putting as much as you can on the property with the reaction of the neighbouring property owners.

Coun. Brent Gallant said he had no concern about increasing the number of allowable units and that a developer investing a large amount of money will want his property to be attractive to potential buyers.

Mayor Basil Stewart questioned why there is a maximum number of units contained in the bylaw and said perhaps the city should consider eliminating that restriction to help encourage development.

The committee directed staff to come up with recommendations about changing the bylaw. The matter will go to a public hearing before going to city council for final action.

Comments

  • Username
    SummersideResident
    - September 10th, 2010 at 08:09:05

    Well I find it interesting, that yet again people here in Prince Edward Island always have something negitive to say about most needed changes here. No wonder so many people are turned off from starting businesses and much needed housing units here. becuase everytime we begin to see some change, theres always so many people fighting against it. For instance, Driftwood Heights B&B is wanting a small atractive sign, on the outskirts of the city, letting potential customers know their whereabouts, but oh no, thats not allowed either. When tourist stop into the information center, they are all directed to Charlottetown or Canvendish, they never really suggest Summerside, Why is that? Summerside has lots of potential to become a booming city, but its not, and I believe its because we need some new members sitting on our city council, someone who understands that this city needs change. Maybe if they opened their eyes, they would see and understand why so many of the younger generation is moving away from here. There is no work, there is no housing, and anytime someone trys to start new businesses or housing, they have millions of obsticals in their way. Time for change around here, and fast.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    East Prince Resident
    - September 9th, 2010 at 09:22:46

    I find it interesting that, once again, the council and mayor aren't concerned about the residents of the city and are, instead, more interested in keeping developers happy. It strikes me as more than a little sad that it's the city employees who are worried about the rights of homeowners--who ironically are the ones who will be voting in the upcoing elections. I do recognize that developers bring dollars to city coffers, however citizens pay taxes, as well. One only has to look at some of the row housing in our outlying communities to see what can happen when developers attempt to fit too many units on a piece of property.

    Submit a Comment

    • Username
      SummersideResident
      - September 9th, 2010 at 15:52:32

      Well I find it interesting, that yet again people here in Prince Edward Island always have something negitive to say about most needed changes here. No wonder so many people are turned off from starting businesses and much needed housing units here. becuase everytime we begin to see some change, theres always so many people fighting against it. For instance, Driftwood Heights B&B is wanting a small atractive sign, on the outskirts of the city, letting potential customers know their whereabouts, but oh no, thats not allowed either. When tourist stop into the information center, they are all directed to Charlottetown or Canvendish, they never really suggest Summerside, Why is that? Summerside has lots of potential to become a booming city, but its not, and I believe its because we need some new members sitting on our city council, someone who understands that this city needs change. Maybe if they opened their eyes, they would see and understand why so many of the younger generation is moving away from here. There is no work, there is no housing, and anytime someone trys to start new businesses or housing, they have millions of obsticals in their way. Time for change around here, and fast.

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Journal Pioneer is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts
loading...

Advertising