Filling in ditches costly for residents



Workers have been steadily moving along Pope Road in recent weeks upgrading drainage systems and filling in ditches. Under the ditch infilling program the federal and provincial governments and the city each contribute a third of the costs, however the ci

Workers have been steadily moving along Pope Road in recent weeks upgrading drainage systems and filling in ditches. Under the ditch infilling program the federal and provincial governments and the city each contribute a third of the costs, however the ci

Published on October 13th, 2009
Published on June 20th, 2010
Stephen Brun RSS Feed
Topics :
Summerside

Summerside -

Filling up ditches along a Summerside street is emptying the pocket books of some residents.
The city's ditch infilling program is currently underway on Pope Road.
Costs related to the work are split three ways between the city and the federal and provincial governments. However Summerside is covering 90 per cent of its share while asking residents of the streets receiving work to pay the remaining 10 per cent.
But that 10 per cent is working out to thousands of dollars which is more than some homeowners can afford, said Pope Road resident Gladys Bryan.
"I agree with the ditch infilling, but it's government property and I think they should be able to do that free of charge," said Bryan. "I don't know what I'm going to do when I can't pay it. At 92 they wouldn't throw me in jail would they? They just can't roll over people like that."
In a letter sent to Pope Road residents, the city estimated property owner contributions to the project to be $53.97 per cubic metre of frontage, the average cost during two previous years of ditch infilling.
Homeowners can either pay their 10 per cent in one lump sum or have the amount added to their regular property tax over a 10-year period with interest added.
The ditch in front of Bryan's home has not yet been filled, but she estimates the bill will total about $2,000 based on the size of her land.
City councillor Garth Lyle, who lives in the area and owns a business on Pope Road, said the city's options for repayment aren't meant to cause any hardship for residents.
"There's never been any legal challenges to this program and I've never heard of anybody being forced to sell their property because of the ditch infilling," Lyle said.
"We realize no one needs another bill but this is the way the city has always done ditch infilling. We're working with the residents to make this as affordable as we can for them."
Residential areas must submit a petition for ditch infilling signed by as close to 100 per cent of residents as possible. Pope Road, however, does not fall into a residential category, so homeowners there had no say in whether their street was selected, Lyle said.
Ken Cornish, another Pope Road resident whose bill for the work was calculated at $1,600, doesn't agree with charging residents or the arbitrary manner in which his street was selected.
"Cosmetics is the biggest aspect to it. We just didn't realize it would be such a cost," he said. "We felt the city should pay the whole shot."

Comments

  • Username
    Sam
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:08:20

    All residents of Summerside will likely be paying for the infilling of the ditches and not just 10% of the total cost either, wake up people your taxes will be footing the bill for the total cost.

    @Bill from Summerside - I didn't think it was legal to park on both sides of a city street, so the police should of been made aware of this and those people's cars that were illegally should of been towed away. The parking violations in this City is ridiculous, maybe if more fines were handed out for these violations the city would need less tax dollars from it's residents.

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Summerside
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:04:39

    OK, let's do the math here.....

    The total cost of infilling each section of ditch are split equally by Federal, Provincial, and Municipal goverments. Of the municipal (or City of Summerside's) share, 10% is paid by the citizen whose property lies adjecent to the ditch infill. If the average cost results calculate at $2000.00 as in the case of Gladys Bryan, then the total cost of infilling one section of ditch adjacent to the property is $60,000.00.

    It doesn't take a mathematician to soon realize that someone is getting RICH with the Summerside ditch infill project.

    I believe that before ANYONE pays for the ditch infilling on their frontage, they should DEMAND to see PROOF that the area in front of their property costs 30x the bill they receive. If not, let's find out what the split really is. Even if the City was paying the entire shot and our portion is 10%, the costs are EXTREME!

    Submit a Comment

  • Username
    Bill
    - June 21st, 2010 at 19:02:31

    These ditches are completely within the boundary lines of provincial or municipal rights of way. Therefore I dont think its fair if residents are forced to pay any portion of the cost of infilling. At least government planners could locate sidewalks farther from the road so residents wouldn't be obligated to cut grass on municipal or provincial property.
    This would also make life safer for pedestrians using these sidewalks unlike the dangerous situation that exists on Pope Rd and other streets where sidewalks are placed right on top of traffic. Case in point; I recently drove down the new section of Willow Ave while there was a football game taking
    place on the new EJ Field. Cars lined both
    sides of the street which was reduced to one way traffic. Streets should be getting wider not more narrow. Who's responsible for this lousy planning anyway?

    Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

This form is NOT used for emailing the article to a friend. Please use the "Send to a friend" link at the top of the page for that purpose.

The Journal Pioneer is not responsible for posted comments. Please be polite and confine your comments to the subject of the posted story. If you have an account, please sign on to it..

(we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Advertising